<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Startling Lack of Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/</link>
	<description>Life, Linux and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Something else that occurs to me is that what looks like steady progress (reduction of transistor size, increase of hard disk density, that sort of thing) can actually be the result of real innovation even if the end result isn&#039;t particularly innovative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else that occurs to me is that what looks like steady progress (reduction of transistor size, increase of hard disk density, that sort of thing) can actually be the result of real innovation even if the end result isn&#8217;t particularly innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d suggest that there is plenty of innovation out there, but it&#039;s not particularly visible/relevant to the average person. Do you keep up with developments in civil engineering? Power electronics? Chemistry? I don&#039;t.

I suggest these as things that have happened since the 1980s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STED_microscopy

MEMs have become huge in the past couple of years and are very exciting. Think about everything that has an accelerometer in it these days!

STED means you can image way beyond the diffraction limit if you can use fluorescent dyes in your experiment. In some cases you can get to effectively Angstrom resolutions, which is insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suggest that there is plenty of innovation out there, but it&#8217;s not particularly visible/relevant to the average person. Do you keep up with developments in civil engineering? Power electronics? Chemistry? I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I suggest these as things that have happened since the 1980s:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STED_microscopy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STED_microscopy</a></p>
<p>MEMs have become huge in the past couple of years and are very exciting. Think about everything that has an accelerometer in it these days!</p>
<p>STED means you can image way beyond the diffraction limit if you can use fluorescent dyes in your experiment. In some cases you can get to effectively Angstrom resolutions, which is insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharms</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>sharms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Nicolai - The exact responses I was looking for were &#039;Hey, here is some cool stuff that will blow your mind&#039;, I don&#039;t by nature want to be pessimistic about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolai &#8211; The exact responses I was looking for were &#8216;Hey, here is some cool stuff that will blow your mind&#8217;, I don&#8217;t by nature want to be pessimistic about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolai Hähnle</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Hähnle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of pessimism. I bet that in 20 years, somebody will write a blog post (or rather, the future equivalent of a blog post) complaining that while we&#039;ve had innovations up until 2010, the following 20 years were void of that.

The fact is simply that on the one hand, you don&#039;t have enough distance from what is happening today to be able to objectively judge it, and on the other hand, you simply don&#039;t hear about cool new stuff being developed today because that&#039;s too specialized. How many people really knew about transistors in 1970? Not too many, I&#039;d wager, outside certain professional and enthusiast circles.

The amount of stuff going on in biotechnology is just crazy. I&#039;m not in that field, but let me just say that the stories I hear regularly from there give me this nice &quot;Wow, I&#039;m living in the future&quot; feeling. Genetic engineering is an everyday technology, for example.

In my own field, amazing breakthroughs have been achieved in the last 20 years and are continually developed, although being a mathematician, this is of course mostly unapplied stuff. Anyway, there&#039;s no reason to be a pessimist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of pessimism. I bet that in 20 years, somebody will write a blog post (or rather, the future equivalent of a blog post) complaining that while we&#8217;ve had innovations up until 2010, the following 20 years were void of that.</p>
<p>The fact is simply that on the one hand, you don&#8217;t have enough distance from what is happening today to be able to objectively judge it, and on the other hand, you simply don&#8217;t hear about cool new stuff being developed today because that&#8217;s too specialized. How many people really knew about transistors in 1970? Not too many, I&#8217;d wager, outside certain professional and enthusiast circles.</p>
<p>The amount of stuff going on in biotechnology is just crazy. I&#8217;m not in that field, but let me just say that the stories I hear regularly from there give me this nice &#8220;Wow, I&#8217;m living in the future&#8221; feeling. Genetic engineering is an everyday technology, for example.</p>
<p>In my own field, amazing breakthroughs have been achieved in the last 20 years and are continually developed, although being a mathematician, this is of course mostly unapplied stuff. Anyway, there&#8217;s no reason to be a pessimist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Scurtescu</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Scurtescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>I have the same feeling, something went wrong with innovation, or at least so it seems.

It&#039;s been 40 years since a human reached the moon, what happened in that field since? Nothing. (all those conspiracy theories about the moon landing almost start to make sense).

Energy production, transportation, medicine, politics, are all frozen. Big monopolies are probably responsible for most of this, just the nature of the beast. Who knows.

The only area where I can seen some real breakthrough is telecommunications. The internet is by far the most important innovation ever, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same feeling, something went wrong with innovation, or at least so it seems.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been 40 years since a human reached the moon, what happened in that field since? Nothing. (all those conspiracy theories about the moon landing almost start to make sense).</p>
<p>Energy production, transportation, medicine, politics, are all frozen. Big monopolies are probably responsible for most of this, just the nature of the beast. Who knows.</p>
<p>The only area where I can seen some real breakthrough is telecommunications. The internet is by far the most important innovation ever, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharms</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>sharms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>@gdeb - I will definitely concede some fields are more difficult than others, and that calculus may take some time to master (I assume most of the readers already have an engineering background with biology / chemistry / physics / calculus as we are Linux geeks).

But on the other hand, when you get the chance to corner a smart person, through experience I have found most don&#039;t have anything to offer other than the basics.  If you want a general understanding of a concept, and it can&#039;t be delivered in a few hours, the person explaining probably doesn&#039;t understand it all that well to begin with.

Some people could take 5 years to explain a concept that Richard Feynman could explain in 5 minutes, it&#039;s all about the presentation I suppose.  I also don&#039;t want to portray that in a few hours anything but a general understanding could be achieved, ie I don&#039;t believe all problems are solvable in that time frame.  For example, I can understand the general idea of video encoding in a few hours, but it might take years to actually create an mplayer equivalent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gdeb &#8211; I will definitely concede some fields are more difficult than others, and that calculus may take some time to master (I assume most of the readers already have an engineering background with biology / chemistry / physics / calculus as we are Linux geeks).</p>
<p>But on the other hand, when you get the chance to corner a smart person, through experience I have found most don&#8217;t have anything to offer other than the basics.  If you want a general understanding of a concept, and it can&#8217;t be delivered in a few hours, the person explaining probably doesn&#8217;t understand it all that well to begin with.</p>
<p>Some people could take 5 years to explain a concept that Richard Feynman could explain in 5 minutes, it&#8217;s all about the presentation I suppose.  I also don&#8217;t want to portray that in a few hours anything but a general understanding could be achieved, ie I don&#8217;t believe all problems are solvable in that time frame.  For example, I can understand the general idea of video encoding in a few hours, but it might take years to actually create an mplayer equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdeb</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>gdeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>Seriously?  I can&#039;t believe anyone would think that.

You said :
&quot;I highly doubt we are pressing the limits of human comprehension, as even the most skilled / difficult fields are very simple once a few hours in understanding are applied.&quot;

Ok, either you are extremely/inhumanely smart (but then, you should be aware that not everyone is like you), or you have no idea what a cutting-edge field is like.

For example, I think it would take 2 or 3 years to a mathematician (with a PhD) to get up to date in another mathematical area (for example, from algebra to topology).  And I am probably generous. So, for a non-mathematician (like yourself?), you would need at least 5 years of full time work to learn enough about a given field to be able to pretend you know it.

So, do you agree with me, or do you seriously believe you can learn a given field (let&#039;s say, algebraic topology) in a few hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously?  I can&#8217;t believe anyone would think that.</p>
<p>You said :<br />
&#8220;I highly doubt we are pressing the limits of human comprehension, as even the most skilled / difficult fields are very simple once a few hours in understanding are applied.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok, either you are extremely/inhumanely smart (but then, you should be aware that not everyone is like you), or you have no idea what a cutting-edge field is like.</p>
<p>For example, I think it would take 2 or 3 years to a mathematician (with a PhD) to get up to date in another mathematical area (for example, from algebra to topology).  And I am probably generous. So, for a non-mathematician (like yourself?), you would need at least 5 years of full time work to learn enough about a given field to be able to pretend you know it.</p>
<p>So, do you agree with me, or do you seriously believe you can learn a given field (let&#8217;s say, algebraic topology) in a few hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ttoilleb</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>ttoilleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Let us not confused revolutionary with evolutionary (ie. innovation).  Evolution/Innovation is a logical, predictable progression.  Revolution is the creation of something new.

The computer has been invented (revolution), everything since is just a logical progression, get over it.

Man developed the airplane, now, where is that &quot;Beam Me Up Scottie&quot;?

Also, Man figured how to stack rocks to build shelter, now when can I &quot;grow&quot; my house a la the Tok&#039;ra, or Superman (Christopher Reeve)?

Better yet, I really want to vacation on Risa, where is F-T-L?

But yes, certain segments of our life have stagnated mainly due to reasons already stated - risk avoidance - &quot;I want my profit NOW&#039;1

Innovation is constantly happening, revolution only happens by accident.  If you live long enough, who knows, you maybe lucky enough to see it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not confused revolutionary with evolutionary (ie. innovation).  Evolution/Innovation is a logical, predictable progression.  Revolution is the creation of something new.</p>
<p>The computer has been invented (revolution), everything since is just a logical progression, get over it.</p>
<p>Man developed the airplane, now, where is that &#8220;Beam Me Up Scottie&#8221;?</p>
<p>Also, Man figured how to stack rocks to build shelter, now when can I &#8220;grow&#8221; my house a la the Tok&#8217;ra, or Superman (Christopher Reeve)?</p>
<p>Better yet, I really want to vacation on Risa, where is F-T-L?</p>
<p>But yes, certain segments of our life have stagnated mainly due to reasons already stated &#8211; risk avoidance &#8211; &#8220;I want my profit NOW&#8217;1</p>
<p>Innovation is constantly happening, revolution only happens by accident.  If you live long enough, who knows, you maybe lucky enough to see it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>To put things in perspective, Calculus has been around for literally hundreds of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put things in perspective, Calculus has been around for literally hundreds of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2010/01/the-startling-lack-of-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=685#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>In my pocket I have a Droid...
A 550 MHz ARM CPU.
The most user friendly OS I have ever touched (pun intended).
854x480 px crammed into a device smaller than my hand.
Internet access EVERYWHERE I GO.
Up to like 48 hours of battery life, depending on usage.
16 BILLION bytes of data on a microSD card smaller than a dime.
A 5 MILLION pixel camera, does video too.
Hundreds of installed apps, mostly written in Java, looking good and running fast.
I&#039;m in complete control of the device, even before rooting it one could argue.
Sandboxed apps running on a Linux based OS, virtually immune to.. most everything, it seems so far.

How much of that existed even TWO years ago?!  Yeah, that&#039;s what I thought.  Go back 20 years and the people making Star Trek couldn&#039;t even IMAGINE such a device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my pocket I have a Droid&#8230;<br />
A 550 MHz ARM CPU.<br />
The most user friendly OS I have ever touched (pun intended).<br />
854&#215;480 px crammed into a device smaller than my hand.<br />
Internet access EVERYWHERE I GO.<br />
Up to like 48 hours of battery life, depending on usage.<br />
16 BILLION bytes of data on a microSD card smaller than a dime.<br />
A 5 MILLION pixel camera, does video too.<br />
Hundreds of installed apps, mostly written in Java, looking good and running fast.<br />
I&#8217;m in complete control of the device, even before rooting it one could argue.<br />
Sandboxed apps running on a Linux based OS, virtually immune to.. most everything, it seems so far.</p>
<p>How much of that existed even TWO years ago?!  Yeah, that&#8217;s what I thought.  Go back 20 years and the people making Star Trek couldn&#8217;t even IMAGINE such a device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

