<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Linux Notetaking Application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/</link>
	<description>Technology, Linux, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eastwind</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/comment-page-1/#comment-5605</link>
		<dc:creator>eastwind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=465#comment-5605</guid>
		<description>for my part I use Treeline , it seems same like keepnote , but have some features like to define model for your node and note , imagine you ll d like keep some quotes ,it s easier if you have define a model for it like a table with the name of the book , the page , the author , the context , etc .... 

http://treeline.bellz.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for my part I use Treeline , it seems same like keepnote , but have some features like to define model for your node and note , imagine you ll d like keep some quotes ,it s easier if you have define a model for it like a table with the name of the book , the page , the author , the context , etc &#8230;. </p>
<p><a href="http://treeline.bellz.org/" rel="nofollow">http://treeline.bellz.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharms</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/comment-page-1/#comment-5595</link>
		<dc:creator>sharms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=465#comment-5595</guid>
		<description>@Scaine - Its all PyGTK, no mono in this.  For some reason I don&#039;t even compare this to Tomboy as Tomboy is for quick notes, whereas this &quot;feels&quot; more like in-depth, organized notes for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scaine &#8211; Its all PyGTK, no mono in this.  For some reason I don&#8217;t even compare this to Tomboy as Tomboy is for quick notes, whereas this &#8220;feels&#8221; more like in-depth, organized notes for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfer</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/comment-page-1/#comment-5594</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=465#comment-5594</guid>
		<description>Never heard of KeepNote, but it looks quite good. Maybe I will give it a try later. Currently I am using zim (http://zim-wiki.org/) which seems to be very similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of KeepNote, but it looks quite good. Maybe I will give it a try later. Currently I am using zim (<a href="http://zim-wiki.org/" rel="nofollow">http://zim-wiki.org/</a>) which seems to be very similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaine</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/06/28/best-linux-notetaking-application/comment-page-1/#comment-5592</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=465#comment-5592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to know if this is better/worse (subjectively) than Tomboy or Gnote (presumably worse, since you&#039;re not using them?).  Or if it&#039;s mono-based.  A lot of discussion on ubuntuforums at the moment revolves around removing tomboy for gnote, but apparently gnote is just a non-mono port of Tomboy and is feature lacking.  If Tomboy goes, that just leaves F-Spot (and possibly Banshee if it makes it in), then there&#039;s a fair bit of space saved on the CD by removing mono.  Assuming that the various replacements aren&#039;t bloated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know if this is better/worse (subjectively) than Tomboy or Gnote (presumably worse, since you&#8217;re not using them?).  Or if it&#8217;s mono-based.  A lot of discussion on ubuntuforums at the moment revolves around removing tomboy for gnote, but apparently gnote is just a non-mono port of Tomboy and is feature lacking.  If Tomboy goes, that just leaves F-Spot (and possibly Banshee if it makes it in), then there&#8217;s a fair bit of space saved on the CD by removing mono.  Assuming that the various replacements aren&#8217;t bloated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
