Comments on: The Cherokee Webserver: Great choice for VPS's http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/ Life, Linux and Technology Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:40:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mark http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-5268 Mark Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:47:23 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-5268 Here is an interesting comparative review of the fatest Web servers and cache servers: http://nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-server-to-use/ Requests per sec. .. Server .................. Type of Server ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 142,000 ............ G-WAN ................... (a Web Application server) 80,000 ............ Nginx ................... (a Web server) 60,000 ............ Lighttpd ................ (a Web server) 52,000 ............ Apache Traffic Server ... (Yahoo!'s "Web accelerator") 28,000 ............ Varnish ................. (Facebook's "Web accelerator") Here is an interesting comparative review of the fatest Web servers and cache servers:

http://nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-server-to-use/

Requests per sec. .. Server ……………… Type of Server

——————————————————————————

142,000 ………… G-WAN ………………. (a Web Application server)

80,000 ………… Nginx ………………. (a Web server)

60,000 ………… Lighttpd ……………. (a Web server)

52,000 ………… Apache Traffic Server … (Yahoo!’s “Web accelerator”)

28,000 ………… Varnish …………….. (Facebook’s “Web accelerator”)

]]> By: sadotmd http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-2073 sadotmd Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:21:04 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-2073 Interesting... personally, I opted for nginx Interesting… personally, I opted for nginx

]]> By: saya http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1114 saya Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:33:29 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1114 Hi sharms, I have also VPS with Plesk Admin + LAMP Stack. I would like to change to Cherokee Webserver + PHP + Mysql + FTP. Can you write complete "building Cherokee Web Hosting " guide? regards, saya Hi sharms,
I have also VPS with Plesk Admin + LAMP Stack. I would like to change to Cherokee Webserver + PHP + Mysql + FTP.
Can you write complete “building Cherokee Web Hosting ” guide?

regards,
saya

]]> By: Hard to read http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1113 Hard to read Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:19:02 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1113 Served up quickly, but the page is brown on brown with tiny fonts. Served up quickly, but the page is brown on brown with tiny fonts.

]]> By: Pierre http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1112 Pierre Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:20:40 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1112 Cherokee claims it is the "fastest web server" while it has been shown 6 TIMES slower (at its best) than others: http://g-wan.com/ And, by the way, G-WAN ANSI C scripts are 5 times faster than Microsoft IIS 7.0 ASP.Net C#. Compare TrustLeap G-WAN 108 KB with Cherokee's footprint (without scripting) and you will understand what small-footprint means. Cherokee claims it is the “fastest web server” while it has been
shown 6 TIMES slower (at its best) than others:

http://g-wan.com/

And, by the way, G-WAN ANSI C scripts are 5 times faster than
Microsoft IIS 7.0 ASP.Net C#.

Compare TrustLeap G-WAN 108 KB with Cherokee’s footprint
(without scripting) and you will understand what small-footprint
means.

]]> By: atc http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1111 atc Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:07:01 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1111 "That is exactly what the webserver world has needed for a long time." No it hasn't. Not one bit. “That is exactly what the webserver world has needed for a long time.”

No it hasn’t. Not one bit.

]]> By: sharms http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1110 sharms Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:59:39 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1110 I went with www.futurehosting.com -- I recommend you check out webhostingtalk.com and view the subforums there. Tons of great deals / coupon codes for VPS providers. I ended up with an OpenVZ VPS with 768MB of ram for $25/mo I went with http://www.futurehosting.com — I recommend you check out webhostingtalk.com and view the subforums there. Tons of great deals / coupon codes for VPS providers.

I ended up with an OpenVZ VPS with 768MB of ram for $25/mo

]]> By: Mike http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1109 Mike Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:49:40 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1109 What provider do you use for VPS? What provider do you use for VPS?

]]> By: Vadim P. http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1108 Vadim P. Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:41:01 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1108 That's great. I was looking for an apache replacement for a low-memory VPS. That’s great. I was looking for an apache replacement for a low-memory VPS.

]]> By: Christopher Denter http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/04/the-cherokee-webserver-great-choice-for-vpss/comment-page-1/#comment-1107 Christopher Denter Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:51:04 +0000 http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=406#comment-1107 If only there was something like mod_wsgi for Cherokee... (Yes, I do know the discussion about that on their mailinglist...) If only there was something like mod_wsgi for Cherokee…

(Yes, I do know the discussion about that on their mailinglist…)

]]>