<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulus package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/</link>
	<description>Life, Linux and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>To me it does make sense that if transportation was targetted as being part of the stimulus package, then a lot of good things can happen.  With transportation being built, such as new highways, light-rails, ect, hundreds of jobs can be created.  People will be paid and will start to pump that money they earn back into the economy.  Also, with more public transportation, individuals will be ale to get to work in a cheaper fashion and will have extra money to spend on whatever they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it does make sense that if transportation was targetted as being part of the stimulus package, then a lot of good things can happen.  With transportation being built, such as new highways, light-rails, ect, hundreds of jobs can be created.  People will be paid and will start to pump that money they earn back into the economy.  Also, with more public transportation, individuals will be ale to get to work in a cheaper fashion and will have extra money to spend on whatever they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny anony</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I think the government is always wrong because it tries to do what is best for many people. I only care for myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the government is always wrong because it tries to do what is best for many people. I only care for myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama's Stimulus Package</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama's Stimulus Package</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>Interesting point...I&#039;d like to see where we would be if Bush was still in office!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point&#8230;I&#8217;d like to see where we would be if Bush was still in office!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephenson Equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephenson Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it&#039;s months after the your original post and we haven&#039;t seen a significant portion of the stimulus impact our clients, or us.

Initially we were hopeful, but maybe that was naivete?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it&#8217;s months after the your original post and we haven&#8217;t seen a significant portion of the stimulus impact our clients, or us.</p>
<p>Initially we were hopeful, but maybe that was naivete?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this video about the stimulus bill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQgLhzf8KQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this video about the stimulus bill:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQgLhzf8KQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQgLhzf8KQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>Please take a look at http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/ and
http://www.gata.org/
http://jsmineset.com/index.php/2009/02/26/hourly-action-in-gold-from-trader-dan-74/

A whole different view.

Regards &amp; lot of respect,

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please take a look at <a href="http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/</a> and<br />
<a href="http://www.gata.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gata.org/</a><br />
<a href="http://jsmineset.com/index.php/2009/02/26/hourly-action-in-gold-from-trader-dan-74/" rel="nofollow">http://jsmineset.com/index.php/2009/02/26/hourly-action-in-gold-from-trader-dan-74/</a></p>
<p>A whole different view.</p>
<p>Regards &amp; lot of respect,</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Harms</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Yeah I am pretty broad with this one, it&#039;s easy to be right and wrong on 1000 different points I suppose.  It was mostly in response to the radio arguments that I hear about how spending can&#039;t possibly work.  Smart grid for power would be a dream come true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I am pretty broad with this one, it&#8217;s easy to be right and wrong on 1000 different points I suppose.  It was mostly in response to the radio arguments that I hear about how spending can&#8217;t possibly work.  Smart grid for power would be a dream come true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: close</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>close</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>While everything you said is right... the fact that so little of the project is infrastructure and so much of it is pork barrel spending negates that. If they did a stimulus bill that was $500 billion (half the amount), all for improving our country&#039;s infrastructure, new roads, new mass transit, maybe even something like a smart grid for power, then maybe they would be solving this problem. However, this bill is double the amount and very, very little of it is for infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While everything you said is right&#8230; the fact that so little of the project is infrastructure and so much of it is pork barrel spending negates that. If they did a stimulus bill that was $500 billion (half the amount), all for improving our country&#8217;s infrastructure, new roads, new mass transit, maybe even something like a smart grid for power, then maybe they would be solving this problem. However, this bill is double the amount and very, very little of it is for infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quamper</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2009/02/stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>quamper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=358#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>&quot;The supplier for the construction materials and vehicles also pays taxes&quot;

Just to clarify a small point for you on that statement it&#039;s not necessarily true (or at least always true). Materials used in a project are typically only taxed once as the final product, the component materials used are generally tax exempt since they final goods/building etc are taxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The supplier for the construction materials and vehicles also pays taxes&#8221;</p>
<p>Just to clarify a small point for you on that statement it&#8217;s not necessarily true (or at least always true). Materials used in a project are typically only taxed once as the final product, the component materials used are generally tax exempt since they final goods/building etc are taxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

