<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.0 Patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/</link>
	<description>Life, Linux and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fta</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>fta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-667</guid>
		<description>url-classifier excessive IO and standard storage for sqlite are two different things. The later will enter hardy-proposed soon. For now, it&#039;s in my PPA. You can have a look at the bzr branch for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>url-classifier excessive IO and standard storage for sqlite are two different things. The later will enter hardy-proposed soon. For now, it&#8217;s in my PPA. You can have a look at the bzr branch for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-666</guid>
		<description>This is already in the current xulrunner-1.9 builds which drive your Firefox under hardy. No need to use hardy-proposed or anything special, just upgrade.

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/hardy-changes/2008-May/011442.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is already in the current xulrunner-1.9 builds which drive your Firefox under hardy. No need to use hardy-proposed or anything special, just upgrade.</p>
<p><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/hardy-changes/2008-May/011442.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/hardy-changes/2008-May/011442.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fta</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>fta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-665</guid>
		<description>See my PPA (~fta). It is integrated starting to xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta3 and it should be available shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my PPA (~fta). It is integrated starting to xulrunner-1.9 1.9~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta3 and it should be available shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilDead</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilDead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-664</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s the high I/O usage I also faced, I manage to get rid of it by disabling the checkboxes &quot;Tell me if the site I&#039;m visiting...&quot; in the Secutiry tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s the high I/O usage I also faced, I manage to get rid of it by disabling the checkboxes &#8220;Tell me if the site I&#8217;m visiting&#8230;&#8221; in the Secutiry tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weeber</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Weeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 03:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-663</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, Canonical is supposed to update Firefox with the Final version of Firefox 3, it&#039;s their responsibility given the fact that Hardy is an LTS release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, Canonical is supposed to update Firefox with the Final version of Firefox 3, it&#8217;s their responsibility given the fact that Hardy is an LTS release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jldugger</title>
		<link>http://www.sharms.org/blog/2008/05/firefox-30-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>jldugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharms.org/blog/?p=145#comment-662</guid>
		<description>The xulrunner fix is in hardy-proposed, which you should be probably be running as an ubuntu developer.  There&#039;s another bug / patch I saw out there that might be related to what you&#039;re talking about though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The xulrunner fix is in hardy-proposed, which you should be probably be running as an ubuntu developer.  There&#8217;s another bug / patch I saw out there that might be related to what you&#8217;re talking about though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

